Is the evidence for or against God?

Everything we think we know about God has come from people.  All religious books were written by people.  All reports of encounters with God were reported by people.  We have: no scrolls or text of any sort written by God, no video or tape recordings of God, and no other communication by God that does not travel first via a human being in order to get the message to the rest of us.  Where is firsthand evidence for the existence of God?

There is no direct evidence.  Is there circumstantial evidence of God?  You may think there is and you would perhaps propose miracles as indirect evidence.  Or you may wonder how trees and animals and everything else could be created without a God.  Mostly you feel there must be a God because your parents told you God existed when you were a child and you certainly don’t want to believe your parents lied to you.

It’s not a lie if your parents really didn’t know they were wrong.  Things can be created just because it’s natural for them to be there.  Unnatural things don’t last long; that is part of evolution.  And miracles are simply things we can’t explain with science today.

God is supposed to be omniscient; all knowing, omnipotent; all-powerful, and perfect.  Do we know these things because we’ve seen God’s resume?  Of course we haven’t.  We have been taught these things by people; people who presume to know what is God.

Imagine an indescribable super-being that is so powerful it can create an entire universe out of nothing.  It is the most powerful thing in the universe.  This super-being knows everything going on in the universe, can create plants, animals, and human beings.  He/she/it can create Angels and banish bad Angels to Hell.

God can decide a plan for humanity throughout eternity.  God can create light and dark, the oceans and the world.  God can destroy people, cities, or the entire world if he wants.  He can make us happy or sad.  God decides who will die and when.  God decides who will live even when things look hopeless to humans.  God can impregnate women through the air without their permission.  God defines sin.  God can take away our sin at will, but chooses not to do so on certain occasions.

God does all of this and much, much more.  And we can’t even begin to imagine how God accomplishes any of it.  However, religious people always claim to know what God wants of us.  They claim to know which writings by humans were inspired by God.  They claim to know how much sex God wants us to have and under what circumstances.  They claim to know how God wants us to worship, when, where, and with whom.  They seem to know so much about what this super-being wants of us and yet no one can tell you what God looks like.  Why can’t we see God?  The easy religious answer is God won’t let us look at him.  Solves that issue, doesn’t it?

They claim to know that God’s purpose in having Abraham attempt to kill Abraham’s son, was to test Abraham’s faith in God.  However, since God is omniscient (all knowing), shouldn’t God have already known Abraham’s conscience and loyalty?  The test was unnecessary if God is really omniscient.

If God is omnipotent (all powerful), why would we be put on earth to learn?  God could snap His fingers, if He has fingers, and make us know whatever He wishes us to know and all the time people spend learning about God would be unnecessary.  We could just know it if He wished it so.

Why would God make a rule whereby people must believe in Him in order to have everlasting life and then refuse to interact with mankind on any level that would leave no doubt that God exists?  The idea that we must have faith in God in order to go to heaven, without direct and undeniable proof from God of his existence and wishes, sounds like God is playing some kind of child’s game.  Is God a child?

Did God create the great flood to correct a mistake?  Mistakes from God are not possible because God is perfect.  If God was punishing people for not following his law, is that not an indicator that God’s teaching methods are flawed?  But, they can’t be flawed, because He is perfect.

Can the all-powerful God create a being more powerful than Himself?  If He can, then He is no longer “all-powerful.”  If He can’t, he was never “all-powerful.”  The idea of an omnipotent God does not make sense.  It’s an oxymoron.

There are so many contradictions within religion that the questions can go on forever.  The spurious answers to those questions will lead to new questions.  The only sensible answer I can see follows the principal of Occum’s Razor; the simplest answer is usually the right answer.  The only answer to the question of God’s existence that also answers all the questions that conflict each other is that God does not exist.

Or, look at it this way; many people believe the universe is so varied, unique, and complicated that it could only have been created by God.  I believe the universe is so varied, unique, and complicated, that creation by a single being is too simple an answer and therefore not possible.

Eran

Posted in Religion | Leave a comment

Are Good and Evil Real?

Do good and evil exist? What is good and what is evil? I believe they are relative terms that that exist only within the framework of circumstances surrounding them. Nothing is inherently good or inherently evil. I think this is easily proved by asking questions about any given set of circumstance.

For example, is killing good or evil? That is a rather broad question, so we should break it down a little further by determining what it is that we are killing. Is killing an animal good or evil? If you catch a domestic cat and smash its head in with a hammer for no reason, you would probably consider that behavior as evil. What if the cat was full of disease, like rabies, and was running loose around your secluded mountain property and tried to bite your children on several occasions. Perhaps you could get no help from the local authorities to catch the animal. You happen to trap the cat and your hammer is your only tool in hand when the cat tries to bite you. Is it a bad thing you then killed that cat?

What if you killed a deer to feed your family while stranded and lost in the mountains? By not killing the deer, you may be killing your family. By killing the deer, your family lives longer than they would otherwise. So, is killing the deer a bad or evil thing? Would allowing your family to die, when you could kill a deer and save them, be the same as killing the deer? If it’s my family, I think not. And you should remember that making a decision to not do something is still a decision. If you believe you should never kill anything and you refuse to kill the deer, you have made a conscious decision to kill your family. You can’t make the excuse that you didn’t kill your family, they just starved to death, because you had the opportunity to prevent them from starving and chose to allow them to starve.

Is it wrong to kill a human being? Not enough info, right? What if a serial killer had your wife and two children captured in the middle of a suspension bridge and he was slowly chopping the rope that holds up the bridge. You have the means to kill the serial killer, but he is a human being. You may believe you can’t kill a living person, but if you don’t kill the serial killer soon, you allow your wife and two kids to fall into the chasm below and die. If you don’t kill the killer, you will have consciously made the choice to kill your family. You can’t say the serial killer killed them. Yes, he contributed, but the decision to allow him to kill your family was made by you, if you could have stopped it and chose not to take the necessary to save your family.

Good and evil are relative terms that depend on the circumstances at that time. “Well, there must be something that is purely evil,” you say. What then? Can you name a bad thing that is never good no matter what the circumstances might be? I think you can’t because good and evil are merely terms that describe an action or event based on the circumstances at the time it occurred.

KNUS radio host, Dennis Prager, has talked about good and evil and said he thought people were born with both qualities. He gave the example of babies being born with jealousy. I like Dennis Prager, but many of his decisions are based on his Jewish beliefs. Whenever you have God as the premise of a logical formula, you are never guaranteed a valid answer. Why? The existence of God is a theory, not a fact. No one can prove God exists. Therefore, any conclusions based on the premise that God exists may be faulty. I didn’t say they are faulty, but they may be faulty. You can input wrong information into a computer and still get the right answer, although I doubt it happens often.

I thought it was rather silly to say babies are born with a built in jealousy emotion. I believe jealousy is something that is learned behavior. I am certainly not aware of any scientific studies that show jealousy is an instinct. And, I wonder if jealousy is always bad.

If I told you I found out my wife slept with another man and I felt angry and I was jealous of that act, what would you say? Would you say I should not be jealous? Would you say jealousy is a bad thing and I should stop feeling jealous?

What if I told you my wife was sleeping with other men and I was not jealous? Would you consider that normal and a good thing, because to have jealousy is bad?

I digress. Is jealousy an instinct at birth? I think not. Jealousy is a learned behavior. We learn it from our parents and other people we are around when we are children. The first roots of jealousy may become apparent when a parent takes away something of value to them because they are afraid the child may break it. I’m sure you can think of many things that parents do that may root the feelings of jealousy in a child.

Another proof against the theory that jealousy is a born instinct is that I know people who are not jealous. If it’s an emotion we are born with, why don’t they have it? Could it be they were brought up in a way that jealousy never made an impression on them as a quality they needed to have?

Let’s look at it another way. Why are Catholics Catholic? Is it because they were brought up that way? Why are Jews Jewish? Is it because they were brought up that way? Why are people jealous? You can guess my response. Maybe it’s because they were brought up that way. They saw jealousy in their parents, neighbors, friends, and schoolmates. Maybe they were taught jealousy. I think so.

Our emotions are relative to the circumstances surrounding us at any given time. Good and evil are also relative to the circumstances surrounding us at any given time. And yes, the circumstances surrounding us include things like societies beliefs and the laws of the society we live in. Therefore, there is no definitive ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ in the world. It’s all based on our perceptions of right and wrong and our perceptions may not always be correct for any given set of circumstance. Think about it.

Eran

Posted in Philosophy & Stuff | Leave a comment